- Ms Word Format
- 77 Pages
- ₦3000
- 1-5 Chapters
comparison of academic performance of junior secondary school students in geography in external examinations from 2003-2007. (a case study of enugu north local government area, enugu state
COMPARISON OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GEOGRAPHY IN EXTERNAL EXAMINATIONS FROM 2003-2007. (A CASE STUDY OF ENUGU NORTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, ENUGU STATE
introduction
Comparism Of Academic Performance Of Junior Secondary School Students In geography In External Examinations project material. Please, sit back and study the below research material carefully. DO NOT copy word for word. aim of providing this Comparism Of Academic Performance Of Junior Secondary School Students In geography In External Examinations project research material is to reduce the stress of moving from one school library to another all in the name of searching for Comparism Of Academic Performance Of Junior Secondary School Students In geography In External Examinations research materials. We are not encouraging any form of plagiarism. This service is legal because, all institutions permit their students to read previous projects, books, articles or papers while developing their own works. According to Austin Kleon “All creative work builds on what came before”
ABSTRACT
The research investigated the comparison of academic performances of junior Science in External Examinations from 2003- 2007. This study is a survey research design. It is a research conducted on a large number o f people to identify general opinion. The study was carried out in Enugu North Local Government Area. The area belongs to Enugu Educational Zone. The population of the study consist of all the students and teachers in junior secondary schools in Enugu North Local Government Area, Enugu State. The population of the students are 20, 470 while that of teachers are 4, 300. We used four junior secondary schools as our sample out of the junior secondary schools in Enugu North Local Government Area, Enugu State. Random sampling techniques were used to select ten (10) students from each of the schools used in the table listed above to ensure that the relevant features of the population were adequately represented. Five (5) staff (teachers) from each of the schools were also sampled. The instrument used was a questionnaire design to elicit responses on the items in questions. The researchers used the four like scale of strongly agreed (SA), Agreed (A) Disagreed (D) and strongly |Disagreed (SD). The respondents are required to tick against the column that best describes their views in each item. The questionnaire will be distributed to ten (10) students from each schools and five (5) teachers from each schools and will also be collected through item. The researchers’ used mean to analyze and interpret the data. Interpretation of the data was based on the following scores interval:
SA – Strongly Agreed – 4 points
A – Agreed – 3 points
D – Disagreed – 2 points
SD- Strongly Disagreed – 1 point
The output was determined by finding the mean of each number.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title Page
Approval Page
Certification
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table Of Contents
Chapter One:
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background Of The Study
1.2 Statement Of The Problem
1.3 Purpose Of The Study
1.4 Significances Of The Study
1.5 Scope Of The Study
1.6 Research Questions
1.7 Limitations
Chapter Two:
2.0 Review Of Related Literature
2.1 Teachers Perception On The Conduct Of External Examination
2.2 The External Examination Bodies In Nigeria
2.3 External Examination And Assessment
Chapter Three:
3.0 Research Methodology
3.1 Research Design
3.2 Area Of The Study
3.3 Population Of The Study
3.4 Sample And Sampling Techniques
3.5 Instrument For Data Collection
3.6 Method Of Data Analysis
3.7 Decision Rule
Chapter Four:
4.0 Presentation And Analysis Of Data
4.1 Research Question 1
4.2 Research Question 2
4.3 Research Question 3
Chapter Five:
5.0 Discussion, Summary And Conclusion
5.1 Discussion Of Findings
5.2 Educational Implication
5.3 Recommendation
5.4 Summary And Conclusion
References
Appendix